Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Teachers vs. Technology



Education has always been and always will be an important topic.  Parents want the best education for their children, education is a leading arguement in politics and how we educate our workforce dictates our countries economic future.  Tom Clanton, a journalist for The Daily Courier presents an intriuging view on the subject in his editorial "Trust seasoned judgement in eductation". 

In his article Clanton's sides with old fashioned philosophy over technology.  His central theme concentrates on the ideal that teachers should be trusted to educate their students without state or national standards judging and dictating their work.  With that in mind he offers up the idea that standards aren't bad in all situations using the FDA as an example on food safety regulations.  It is true, no one would want extra pesticides on their food just because different states had different regulations.

One of his points was that computers and statistics cannot judge a students human-ness.  Whether or not they are putting forth enough effort, or whether or not they are intelligent enough to digest the material in the first place.  These factors clearly have effects on a students education.  The disappointment that comes with failure has caused mankind to demand measurable data in an effort to "right" the system.  Teachers are also known to inspire their students; to show them the light at the end of the tunnel.  In this regard Clanton points out that perhaps some educators are not "meant" to be in the field.  Let's face it, many who teach do so because of the appeal of summers off or, due to the economy, simply obtained a teaching certificate because of the lack of jobs in their desired fields.  It should up to school boards and principals to dicern the quality of their staff, not simply test scores. 

The fact that funding can also be largely based on achieving certain standards through testing is also quite alarming.  Since when did our public school systems become so undemocratic.  Shouldn't all students be treated equally and be given the same financial aid?  After looking at http://www.azed.gov/finance/, I didn't find any direct correlation between funding and test scores, although the term "analyzing data" was in the mix.  And I'd also be surprised if those test scores didn't have an impact on teachers salaries. 

I am a true believer in using technology in education, but I agree with Mr. Clanton in the regard that good teachers cannot be replaced; they are invaluable to the education process.  I couldn't find hardly any solid statistics relating to this subject, probably because it's hard to measure human-ness.  Still I find myself in complete agreement with Mr. Clanton on this one.  What do you think?

http://dcourier.com/main.asp?SectionID=36&SubSectionID=73&ArticleID=108073&TM=60943.09

1 comment:

  1. I found this article interesting because the guy stated right up front that he doesn't know much about the issue. I know someone who does though; my mom taught in the Arizona Public School system for several years. She said No Child Left Behind was one of the worst things that happened to kids and schools. Funding is based on how kids perform on standardized tests. But the kids and schools that are under-performing are usually the ones the need MORE funding, not less. And standardized testing is not the answer because lots of kids don't do well on tests that were originally designed for white, middle-class students. I watched the documentary "Waiting for Superman" about the education system in New York City and it was really informative. They found that charter schools that gave their teachers the flexibility to teach students how they saw fit far out-performed public schools that were forced to stick to set lesson plans and standardized tests. And they showed how there are so few spots in those charter schools that there are lotteries every year to try and get your child into them. But the public schools can and should learn from the success of the charters. I believe this is true in a lot of places, although I'm certainly not implying that charters are always better schools because they most certainly are not.

    ReplyDelete